
This letter was sent to Congress on Wed Sept 24 2008 regarding the Treasury plan as outlined on that date. It does not reflect all signatories views on subesquent plans or modifications of the bill, although some of the economists on this list added their names as recently as the 27th.
To the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate:
As economists, we want to express to Congress our great concern for the plan proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson to deal with the financial crisis. We are well aware of the difficulty of the current financial situation and we agree with the need for bold action to ensure that the financial system continues to function. We see three fatal pitfalls in the currently proposed plan:
1) Its fairness. The plan is a subsidy to investors at taxpayers' expense. Investors who took risks to earn profits must also bear the losses. Not every business failure carries systemic risk. The government can ensure a well-functioning financial industry, able to make new loans to creditworthy borrowers, without bailing out particular investors and institutions whose choices proved unwise.
2) Its ambiguity. Neither the mission of the new agency nor its oversight are clear. If taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards.
3) Its long-term effects. If the plan is enacted, its effects will be with us for a generation. For all their recent troubles, America's dynamic and innovative private capital markets have brought the nation unparalleled prosperity. Fundamentally weakening those markets in order to calm short-run disruptions is desperately short-sighted.
For these reasons we ask Congress not to rush, to hold appropriate hearings, and to carefully consider the right course of action, and to wisely determine the future of the financial industry and the U.S. economy for years to come.
Signed (updated at 9/27/2008 6:00PM CT)
Acemoglu Daron (Massachussets Institute of Technology)
Ackerberg Daniel (UCLA)
Adler Michael (Columbia University)
Admati Anat R. (Stanford University)
Ales Laurence (Carnegie Mellon University)
Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)
Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)
Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)
Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)
Banerjee Abhijit V. (Massachussets Institute of Technology)
Barankay Iwan (University of Pennsylvania)
Barry Brian (University of Chicago)
Bartkus James R. (Xavier University of Louisiana)
Becker Charles M. (Duke University)
Becker Robert A. (Indiana University)
Beim David (Columbia University)
Berk Jonathan (Stanford University)
Bisin Alberto (New York University)
Bittlingmayer George (University of Kansas)
Blank Emily (Howard University)
Boldrin Michele (Washington University)
Bollinger, Christopher R. (University of Kentucky)
Bossi, Luca (University of Miami)
Brooks Taggert J. (University of Wisconsin)
Brynjolfsson Erik (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Buera Francisco J.(UCLA)
Cabral Luis (New York University)
Camp Mary Elizabeth (Indiana University)
Carmel Jonathan (University of Michigan)
Carroll Christopher (Johns Hopkins University)
Cassar Gavin (University of Pennsylvania)
Chaney Thomas (University of Chicago)
Chari Varadarajan V. (University of Minnesota)
Chauvin Keith W. (University of Kansas)
Chintagunta Pradeep K. (University of Chicago)
Christiano Lawrence J. (Northwestern University)
Clementi, Gian Luca (New York University)
Cochrane John (University of Chicago)
Coleman John (Duke University)
Constantinides George M. (University of Chicago)
Cooley, Thomas (New York University)
Crain Robert (UC Berkeley)
Culp Christopher (University of Chicago)
Da Zhi (University of Notre Dame)
Darity, William (Duke University)
Davis Morris (University of Wisconsin)
De Marzo Peter (Stanford University)
Dubé Jean-Pierre H. (University of Chicago)
Edlin Aaron (UC Berkeley)
Eichenbaum Martin (Northwestern University)
Ely Jeffrey (Northwestern University)
Eraslan Hülya K. K.(Johns Hopkins University)
Fair Ray (Yale University)
Faulhaber Gerald (University of Pennsylvania)
Feldmann Sven (University of Melbourne)
Fernandez, Raquel (New York University)
Fernandez-Villaverde Jesus (University of Pennsylvania)
Fohlin Caroline (Johns Hopkins University)
Fox Jeremy T. (University of Chicago)
Frank Murray Z.(University of Minnesota)
Frenzen Jonathan (University of Chicago)
Fuchs William (University of Chicago)
Fudenberg Drew (Harvard University)
Gabaix Xavier (New York University)
Gao Paul (Notre Dame University)
Garicano Luis (University of Chicago)
Gerakos Joseph J. (University of Chicago)
Gibbs Michael (University of Chicago)
Glomm Gerhard (Indiana University)
Goettler Ron (University of Chicago)
Goldin Claudia (Harvard University)
Gordon Robert J. (Northwestern University)
Greenstone Michael (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Gregory, Karl D. (Oakland University)
Guadalupe Maria (Columbia University)
Guerrieri Veronica (University of Chicago)
Hagerty Kathleen (Northwestern University)
Hamada Robert S. (University of Chicago)
Hansen Lars (University of Chicago)
Harris Milton (University of Chicago)
Hart Oliver (Harvard University)
Hazlett Thomas W. (George Mason University)
Heaton John (University of Chicago)
Heckman James (University of Chicago - Nobel Laureate)
Henderson David R. (Hoover Institution)
Henisz, Witold (University of Pennsylvania)
Hertzberg Andrew (Columbia University)
Hite Gailen (Columbia University)
Hitsch Günter J. (University of Chicago)
Hodrick Robert J. (Columbia University)
Hollifield Burton (Carnegie Mellon University)
Hopenhayn Hugo (UCLA)
Hurst Erik (University of Chicago)
Imrohoroglu Ayse (University of Southern California)
Isakson Hans (University of Northern Iowa)
Israel Ronen (London Business School)
Jaffee Dwight M. (UC Berkeley)
Jagannathan Ravi (Northwestern University)
Jenter Dirk (Stanford University)
Jones Charles M. (Columbia Business School)
Jovanovic Boyan (New York University)
Kaboski Joseph P. (Ohio State University)
Kahn Matthew (UCLA)
Kaplan Ethan (Stockholm University)
Karaivanov Alexander (Simon Fraser University)
Karolyi, Andrew (Ohio State University)
Kashyap Anil (University of Chicago)
Keim Donald B (University of Pennsylvania)
Ketkar Suhas L (Vanderbilt University)
Kiesling Lynne (Northwestern University)
Klenow Pete (Stanford University)
Koch Paul (University of Kansas)
Kocherlakota Narayana (University of Minnesota)
Koijen Ralph S.J. (University of Chicago)
Kondo Jiro (Northwestern University)
Korteweg Arthur (Stanford University)
Kortum Samuel (University of Chicago)
Krueger Dirk (University of Pennsylvania)
Ledesma Patricia (Northwestern University)
Lee Lung-fei (Ohio State University)
Leeper Eric M. (Indiana University)
Letson David (University of Miami)
Leuz Christian (University of Chicago)
Levine David I.(UC Berkeley)
Levine David K.(Washington University)
Levy David M. (George Mason University)
Linnainmaa Juhani (University of Chicago)
Lott John R. Jr. (University of Maryland)
Lucas Robert (University of Chicago - Nobel Laureate)
Ludvigson, Sydney C. (New York University)
Luttmer Erzo G.J. (University of Minnesota)
Manski Charles F. (Northwestern University)
Martin Ian (Stanford University)
Mayer Christopher (Columbia University)
Mazzeo Michael (Northwestern University)
McDonald Robert (Northwestern University)
Meadow Scott F. (University of Chicago)
Meeropol, Michael (Western New England College)
Mehra Rajnish (UC Santa Barbara)
Mian Atif (University of Chicago)
Middlebrook Art (University of Chicago)
Miguel Edward (UC Berkeley)
Miravete Eugenio J. (University of Texas at Austin)
Miron Jeffrey (Harvard University)
Moeller, Thomas (Texas Christian University)
Moretti Enrico (UC Berkeley)
Moriguchi Chiaki (Northwestern University)
Moro Andrea (Vanderbilt University)
Morse Adair (University of Chicago)
Mortensen Dale T. (Northwestern University)
Mortimer Julie Holland (Harvard University)
Moskowitz, Tobias J. (University of Chicago)
Munger Michael C. (Duke University)
Muralidharan Karthik (UC San Diego)
Nair Harikesh (Stanford University)
Nanda Dhananjay (University of Miami)
Nevo Aviv (Northwestern University)
Ohanian Lee (UCLA)
Pagliari Joseph (University of Chicago)
Papanikolaou Dimitris (Northwestern University)
Parker Jonathan (Northwestern University)
Paul Evans (Ohio State University)
Pearce David (New York University)
Pejovich Svetozar (Steve) (Texas A&M University)
Peltzman Sam (University of Chicago)
Perri Fabrizio (University of Minnesota)
Phelan Christopher (University of Minnesota)
Piazzesi Monika (Stanford University)
Pippenger, Michael K. (University of Alaska)
Piskorski Tomasz (Columbia University)
Platt Brennan C. (Brigham Young University)
Rampini Adriano (Duke University)
Ray, Debraj (New York University)
Reagan Patricia (Ohio State University)
Reich Michael (UC Berkeley)
Reuben Ernesto (Northwestern University)
Rizzo, Mario (New York University)
Roberts Michael (University of Pennsylvania)
Robinson David (Duke University)
Rogers Michele (Northwestern University)
Rotella Elyce (Indiana University)
Roussanov Nikolai (University of Pennsylvania)
Routledge Bryan R. (Carnegie Mellon University)
Ruud Paul (Vassar College)
Safford Sean (University of Chicago)
Samaniego Roberto (George Washington University)
Sandbu Martin E. (University of Pennsylvania)
Sapienza Paola (Northwestern University)
Savor Pavel (University of Pennsylvania)
Schaniel William C. (University of West Georgia)
Scharfstein David (Harvard University)
Seim Katja (University of Pennsylvania)
Seru Amit (University of Chicago)
Shang-Jin Wei (Columbia University)
Shimer Robert (University of Chicago)
Shore Stephen H. (Johns Hopkins University)
Siegel Ron (Northwestern University)
Smith David C. (University of Virginia)
Smith Vernon L.(Chapman University- Nobel Laureate)
Sorensen Morten (Columbia University)
Spatt Chester (Carnegie Mellon University)
Spear Stephen (Carnegie Mellon University)
Stevenson Betsey (University of Pennsylvania)
Stokey Nancy (University of Chicago)
Strahan Philip (Boston College)
Strebulaev Ilya (Stanford University)
Sufi Amir (University of Chicago)
Tabarrok Alex (George Mason University)
Taylor Alan M. (UC Davis)
Thompson Tim (Northwestern University)
Troske Kenneth (University of Kentucky)
Tschoegl Adrian E. (University of Pennsylvania)
Uhlig Harald (University of Chicago)
Ulrich, Maxim (Columbia University)
Van Buskirk Andrew (University of Chicago)
Vargas Hernan (University of Phoenix)
Veronesi Pietro (University of Chicago)
Vissing-Jorgensen Annette (Northwestern University)
Wacziarg Romain (UCLA)
Walker Douglas O. (Regent University)
Walker, Todd (Indiana University)
Weill Pierre-Olivier (UCLA)
Williamson Samuel H. (Miami University)
Witte Mark (Northwestern University)
Wolfenzon, Daniel (Columbia University)
Wolfers Justin (University of Pennsylvania)
Woutersen Tiemen (Johns Hopkins University)
Wu Yangru (Rutgers University)
Yue Vivian Z. (New York University)
Zingales Luigi (University of Chicago)
Zitzewitz Eric (Dartmouth College)
This is incredible! Keneysian Economists agree with Austrian Guru's that this will tank the Economy!?
INCREDIBLE!!
Thank you Freed for posting this.
I am surprised that even the Hayek economists who are responsible for this mess are actually in agreement with Keneysian's This is unprecedented !!
The Laz a faire capitalists must be put to bed now, Its the end of Free Market Capitalism as Marx predicted. The center right must now be demolished for all time, if it is not, we will have no choice but to shift even further towrads ultra rightist nationalist based policies, under pinned by corpratists, and that is Fascism.
We are now on the cusp of a new era, do we go backwards to the failures of Fascism or do we move forward to a new form of democratic socialism?
There is no option to fix this broken system, any attempt to do so will result in the worst economic depression since the collapse of Rome. A new Dark age.
The Laz a faire capitalists must be put to bed now, Its the end of Free Market Capitalism as Marx predicted.
Let`s hope not. I don`t confuse legal stealing with capitilism.
Well they were given a free hand and they not only took advantage of it but they bit that hand too. Creating packages mixed with dodgy debt and then using ratings agencies that had clear conflicts of interest to sell them off as AAA+.
No this must never happen again. and it wont. If the US wants to continue doing business with the world, it will not be on their terms. If the US government wont regulate its own businesses then they will get no credit, not one cent.
Now either the US covers those international debts, or the world finical system will disintegrate totally, and wages are so low in the US that it will mean a deep depression, not a recession, for the US. And the US Laz a faire capitalist system is dead. No one will do business with such an unstable and volatile system again.
Its the end of Free Market Capitalism as Marx predicted.
I'm curious about this "Free Market Capitalism" you are speaking of. I haven't seen it. We haven't had a free market in my lifetime (I'm only 34). Free markets work when they are allowed to be free which includes freedom from propping up failing companies. We did it with the auto makers several times and look where that got us. Bad cars made by incompetent companies (in general. Not all American cars are bad). We've propped up telecommunications companies and let them write the bills that congress passes in their favor. A free market must be free to allow companies to fail. That is the key ingredient that we've been missing
As for mortgage companies. They were not only given a free hand but a mandate by government to take on bad debt
Free markets work when they are allowed to be free which includes freedom from propping up failing companies
The US has had free markets, Twisting the language will not change the fact that they have failed. If what you say is correct, the great depression of the 1930's would have never ended. The US tried the Hayek system, and where warned repeatedly that this would end in tears, and not just by Marx.
The free market is not working precisely because it is free, and no one knows which American banks are solvent and which ones are insolvent. So no one will lend them money.
As for the guts of your commet, well we dont still make steam trains just to keep boiler makers in a job, but there is a limit to how many people you can put out of work before the country goes completely over to anarchy.
If you want to see what happens to a country that has a true Laz a faire system, look at France, and we all know how that ended with Guillotines, and military defeat at Trafalgar and Waterloo.
The problem with free markets and competition is quite simple, Some one always wins a competition and someone loses, and so, the inevitable result is a monopoly.
Blaming the government is a popular past time for Americans and for some weird reason that seems to lead them to a ridiculous automatic assumption that, if government is bad, then private enterprise must be good. How this ever took root in the American psyche is beyond comprehension, but if Americans dont get over it, then you are going to have a very hard landing. This is the real world, there are no time machines, no second chances, no prayers will be answered, Americans are living with the consequences of their own actions, not the governments, the gov, did not re mortgage your house and blow the money on plasma TV's from China and SUV's from Japan, The American public did, They maxed out their credit cards, They allowed a government that was only elected by half the people to dictate a suicidal foreign policy, and the American people allowed a criminal gang to hijack their dangerously weak democracy, and steal a trillion $ from the coffers. They allowed a corporate culture of failure to flourish, unchecked for decades, and now you will have to wake up and smell the coffee, and realize that it is over. America has 7 years to balance its trade deficit, and so far I have not heard a single word about this fact, So if Americans are not going to do this, then the entire country will be insolvent by 2017.
Let's just call it the heist of the century and admit we're being sold into servitude. Heck of a job!
So what do these Bankers actually do to get 20 or 30 million per year Hmmm lets see, They track growth, Occasionally they cut some jobs or take a bit of competition from each other to keep the ratio's right, but now come on, is that really worth a pay check of 25 million $ ??
Nothing is worth a paycheck of $ 20 million a year.
Free market economies self adjust. We need to free the market and allow it to adjust itself. We definitely do not need more government interference.
200 leading Economists write Congress Warning Bailout will make things Worse!
Congress should know that ignoring their constituents can really make things worse for them personally.
Sorry jpark this crisis proves that free unregulated markets can not be trusted, and should never be trusted, and they will never be trusted again.
You may call it government interference, but I call it regulation. It is lack of regulation that has caused this, and a lack of accountability of the US government will prolong it.
If not now then when will you accept that the American Laz a faire capitalist system is as dead as the Soviet Union. America has 7 years to pay off its debts or it will be insolvent. Where is that money going to come from? Who is going to buy 10 trillion USD over the next 5 years? What does America have left to sell worth 10 trillion USD ?
The very best America can hope for is to bail out the banks so they can guarantee their foreign holdings to companies like HSBC, ICBC and UBS and pray to G.O.D. the world takes pity on you.
Its time to pay the piper, America made its choices and it chose badly, there are no second chances, you must live with your decisions, and to quote Wall st, "Thats the bottom line"
SthPacific,
You confuse the financial institutions and investors with Americans. The average American did not loan money to people who could not pay. The average American did not create a credit instrument which was guaranteed to cause default. The average American did not foreclose on his creditors and then complain about the foreclosures.
The federal government encouraged financial institutions to relax credit and extend credit to people who could not pay. The financial institutions (not all of them) were happy to comply and reaped massive profits. Investors also saw an opportunity for profit and bought and traded overpriced paper.
Let the financial institutions who played with fire get singed. Let the investors who bought and sold overvalued paper lose on the paper they bought but failed to sell.
Let the average American get on with his life without robbing him further.
No this will not happen, You cant just sell a bunch of dodgy debt as a package off on the international market that was clearly fraudulent and expect to get away with it, I dont care if you think this is fair, or if you were in any way responsible. It is your government and it is supposedly a democracy, so you are responsible for the actions of this institution. Just as any other country would be. Do you think that US armed forces cared a hoot about Saddam Husseins tea lady when they tossed here out on the street with not two pennies to rub together during de-bathhification, No ofcourse not,
300 million people owe the world at least 6 trillion USD and they are going to have to pay, or NO MORE CREDIT ever !! Look at how low wages are in the US, if you dont have credit and you have to pay cash for all the oil the USA uses, how long do you think you could hold out with gasoline at 12$ a gallon ? if you can get it.
The average American did not foreclose on his creditors and then complain about the foreclosures.
The average American re-mortgaged their house and then blew the cash on Chinese imports, now the value of that house has fallen by 16% so they default, The Government privatized pension funds 401k's so the banks have no savings, thats 50% of there income gone, all because greedy Americans believed in some myth about private enterprise and wanted to make a few dollars more.
For the average American, its time to pay up, and pay up they will, no more 401k, no more credit cards, no more easy home loans, with no money down, 10% deposit minimum, and 8 $ a gallon gasoline, and thats the best you'll get, try and revive this failed system, and I assure you it will be much worse than that.
SthPacific,
You cant just sell a bunch of dodgy debt as a package off on the international market that was clearly fraudulent and expect to get away with it, I dont care if you think this is fair, or if you were in any way responsible.
I did not sell a bunch of dodgy debt on the international market. The federal government did not sell a bunch of dodgy debt on the international market.
People in the U.S. and everywhere else in the world buy and sell on the stock exchanges. Everyone who plays the market is responsible for his/her own choices.
I am not responsible, you are not responsible and the U.S. government is not responsible.
The people who sell are responsible for their sales. The people who buy are responsible for their purchases.
I did not sell a bunch of dodgy debt on the international market. The federal government did not sell a bunch of dodgy debt on the international market.
You may not be responsible, but you are accountable. So is the US government. If those who are responsible for this mess, cant pay up, then the government will have to bail them out. If the government is unable to do this, and they are unable, then it falls upon the American tax payer to fork out. I am not saying that this is fair or right, it is just the way it is, so you have a choice Pay up or starve. If you do not pay up quickly, and the interest is running at about 2.5% per day, then you will get no more credit. HSBC want there money NOW! Get it. Pay up or no more money. Thats life sunshine, this aint Disneyland its the real world, you made bad decisions, and now you have to pay. Just remember that next time you hear someone praising Ronald Reagan and his Reaganomics.
SthPacific,
You may not be responsible, but you are accountable. So is the US government.
No and No. When you borrow money, you are responsible for the note. No one else is. When you default, you are accountable, no one else is.I did not borrow the money and I did not default on it. I am neither responsible nor accountable for it. Neither is the U.S. government.
So why is your tax bill going to rise sharply because of this then, Why is the US government giving up all that money they belongs in your communities infrastructure
Ok you are neither responsible nor accountable for it. Neither is the U.S. government. Who cares.
But you will still have to pay. No matter how you twist and wriggle, its coming out of your pocket.
accountable |əˈkountəbəl|adjective1 (of a person, organization, or institution) required or expected to justify actions or decisions; responsible : government must be accountable to its citizens | parents could be held accountable for their children's actions. See note at responsible .
The fact that our government wants to seize money from us to give to the investors and banks does not make it right. It is wrong.
It does appear that we will be robbed by our own government in this.
If I was you jpark I would demand that all those 401k's be nationalized too, They must be worth something and I imagine that this is the pool of cash that these banks are looking at robbing. The banks could then borrow against this pool and provided there is not a run of retiree's, it should hold up. Then at the end of your working life, you would at least get something back.
Economic Stimulus Package for a Democracy...in My Opinion There is no doubt we are in need of a Stimulus Package that will benefit every American and not a select few. It has been the talk on every major News Network in the World. I am not a politician nor am I an entrepreneur on Wall Street. But I do have a suggestion that will not only benefit the industry of Wall Street but everyone as a whole. It's really simple basic math and common ideals. According to the US Census Bureau, as of today, September 29, 2008 there are estimated 305,294,210 Americans living in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. We are talking a large sum of money for the Bail Out. Here is my suggestion, for what it is worth, for all involved. Every American, eighteen and older, receives into there household, $1,000,000 taxable income. Every tax collecting branch of the government, from Federal, State and local municipalities will benefit from this. Every child shall receive $150,000 nontaxable income, only if it is placed in an investment plan for college. All taxes will be paid on this annuity when withdrawn for educational purposes. With this plan, we can also consider freezing on Social Security benefits for future applicants, excluding health care. All the reciprocants presently receiving SS and SSI will continue to receive the benefits. This will enable the Social Security Department to recoup some of the great deficit that it has incurred. Many of these families, that are money smart will pay off their home mortgages, car loans, and any many credit card debts that they have created, thus stimulating the market. Some who have small businesses will invest in growth for a healthier economy, while others will once again re-invest in the Market. State and local assistant programs such as DHS will also gain relief from the burden of expenses. Children who have back child support owed to them will receive their benefits directly off the top of their father's Stimulus check, thus relieving the State and mothers in need. This will allow more tax payer dollars to be spent effectively at all levels of government. What about Wall Street? Whatever the excess of the 700 billion dollars after the package has been enacted should have strict oversight. The institutions which have maintained an honest portfolio with Americans should be the first to receive assistance. The others, well let the chips fall where they may. Kenny Rogers said it best, " You gotta know when to hold them, know when to fold them, know when to walk away, know when to run...", the Market was created to gamble, if you have lost, I'm truly sorry for you. But a proficient gambler very seldom loses. Unfortunately, I believe we have left too many novices at the table.
Bravo! Bravissimo!! Brilliant, Preacher!
Let's break this down Preacher. Of 300,000,000 citizens.Let me use this example. Let us say that 75,000,000 of those are men and 75,000,000 are women,who are married to each other with (2) children in their family. That's 150,000,000 maried people with (2) kids in their household or 300,000,000 citizens. 150 million of them adults and 150 million of them children. You advocate "$1,000,000.00 for each of the citizens "over 18 yo".That's equal to $1,000,000.00 x 150,000,000 citizens who are adults. this amounts to $150,000,000,000,000 or 150 Trillion dollars.
Paying the kids their $150,000 ($150,000 x 150,000,000 kids) would cost 22,500,000,000,000 or 22.5 Trillion dollars for a grand total of 172 Trillion dollars. Translated into billions of dollars that amount equals Twenty Two thousand five hundred (22,500) Billion dollars. 21,800 billion dollars more than the bailout of 700 Billion. Check the math man,check the math.
At least I got your attention. But were going to print it anyway and charge the American people for it. Face it, it's all black and white anyway. When was the last time you took your savings and cashed it in for gold. Realistically, the American people have the alienated right to dictate to their representatives what should be done with 700 Billion dollars. It is not going to generate capital gain for the average American. We will still be trying to pay our bills, our mortgages and whatever other debts that have been incurred. It's pretty darn sad when a presidential nominee can solicit the President to come to my home state, have a dinner with the upper elite, make a mill in a matter of a few hours and leave, while Americans can't even keep food in our pantries, or take care of those less fortunate than ourselves. So what's the difference,172 trillion vs. 700 billion, its all a racket anyway. If a bank won't loan you money and you have your money in that bank, pull it. "Old man Potter" deserves everything that coming to him. (Them)
I just meant -- hahaha...
However, on a more serious note -- since the Congress has announced that they aren't going home until they have approved a "Rescue Package". Well, bravo, especially if that's what it takes to keep America free (note that we currently owe China $500Bn of the $700Bn that is being asked)
but IF IN FACT IT IS TRUE that we also need an economic stimulus for taxpayers, as many are saying, then why wouldn't they agree to stay in session until the whole thing is finished, stimulus included.
If the US printed 172 trillion $ you would have inflation that would make Zimbabwe look like a stable economy. Currently US inflation is over 10% or if you prefer the governments statistics, that assumes Americans dont eat or drive, then its 2%
Surprisingly, there are is an adequate number of Americans not eating or driving now. What planet do you live on? Look around...Americans are fed up with the lies and the burden of debts incurred by people that should have never had this amount of control over the financial system of this Nation. I agree with jpark, I didn't make the debt, I shouldn't be responsible for bailing those smucks out. They should be accountable for their errors, God knows, the average American is held accountable. Bad judgement does not constitute a blank check! And as far as insolvency, realistically, we've been insolvent for quite a long time! What goes around, come around!
Hmmm Looks out the window, no stars and stripes here so Im not from planet debt,
Nation. I agree with jpark, I didn't make the debt, I shouldn't be responsible for bailing those smucks out.
I agree with you too, but the fact is, you are accountable whether you like it or not. No HSBC, ICBC and UBS want their money, Pay up now or continue to pay an extra 2.5% per day. If you dont pay you get no more credit. Think of it this way, you just walked out of Disneyland and into the car park, welcome to reality :) Haven't seen yopur kind here for about ooo 25 years
It looks like this bailout has two purposes:
1) Fix short term (0 - 5 years) problems at the expense of long term stability (5 + years)
2) Secure and actually move forward the global economic system that is championed by both Republicans and Democrats. This system empowers corporations as global forces and gives power to groups like the IMF and World bank.
I don't see anything that helps average US citizens.
Why not admit that this "global" economy isn't the great panacea we were told it was by Regan, Clinton, and Bush? If a stimulus package is needed, this is what I propose:
1) Loan money to solvent competent companies to buy some of the failing companies if needed
2) Invest in US infrastructure (public works projects to create short term (0 - 5 years) jobs
3) Invest in small business startups with low interest loans and grants. (Small businesses create jobs and spread the wealth).
Hey Leo ~~ And if you wordsmith that first point to read "solvent competent ONSHORE companies, I think you have pretty much summarized much of Barack's economic plan.
Good point about onshore. I'll have to look more into his plans.
I believe you have a very good point. We have invested too much in global economy, it is not what it has been trumped up to be. Americans have depended on commodities and resources from other countries to the end result. The difference between this economic meltdown and the depression, is the American structural foundation. During the depression, Americans were self sufficient for the most part. Today, we are spread across the world in dependency. We need to re-invest in America. Sure, it's gonna cost a pretty penny, know matter how you look at it. But let's keep the money here and stimulate growth and self sufficiency once again.
Nice wish list guys, but unfortunately bailing out "solvent competent ONSHORE companies," is not an option, The US must first cover the losses by foreign holders in this subprime debacle like HSBC, ICBC and UBS. If the US does not do this, there will be no more credit, ever for the US, and the US economy will implode.
This situation can not be fixed, the US Fed will be Audited by the World bank and when that happens next year Ohhh lordy lordy!!!
The real trouble is the debt, this must be paid back by 2017. So the US economy can not last past the third quarter of 2016 no matter what happens. That does not leave much time to come up with a better way of doing things, and I am still not hearing any suggestions from the US, adapt or die, the US Laz a faire system is in the trash can of history, along with the Soviet Union. The longer it takes for Americans to realize this the worse the pain will be.
If from what I have read already, then, I am glad the bailout was voted down.
Really good article and its things like this we need to keep hammering away with and keep reminding people. The scare tactics are working as my stress level is up. Time to go for a hike, really, with the dogs, just to keep the stress from getting to me
The word needs to go out that credit is not the only way corporations raise capital. Corporations sell stock to raise capital.
Go to the well too many times ... and your shares are diluted (Witness what's happened to Ford and GM. They've made so many offerings they're trading in single digits -- a precursor to bankruptcy.)
Surely you jest. Ford, GM? They are in trouble because didn't see the energy crisis coming.
My point is that during times of tight credit, corporations have other options. If they were asleep at the wheel, and didn't have a plan about what to do in a credit crunch, that's just to bad. Their stock was a poor investment to begin with.
I agree. If this new proposal is for the greater good of the American public, politicians who are pushing this as the answer should 'show' us how our money is well-spent by giving more to banks and financial institutions. Our investments have already been diminished in recent days.
I believe the 'bailout' is for the greater good of big business to simply attain more assets in the form of newly-acquired companies. The big will be biggie-sized; the middle will shrink to have nothing.
If any of this were designed to 'help' small business owners (or even the average taxpayer) the government could pass out duffel bags full of U.S. currency on the streets for average people to buy stock in American companies. That would create an upswing in market conditions.
I did hear on the news some time ago that our leaders did pass out duffel bags filled with billions in US currency to the people on the streets of Baghdad. I wonder what they bought with US billions they were given.
Money seems to be unimportant to our legislators; no end to the spending.
A statewide news source reported that much of the rebuilding of Galveston/the Gulf region due to Hurricane Ike is a casual add-on to this 'bailout' proposal.
I agree with you whole heartily, invest our tax payer dollars in frivolous nonsense, and into countries that would as soon annihilate us than support us. But allow people struck down by tragedy and misfortune in or very own country fend for themselves. There's something terribly wrong with this picture. Then give Wall Street a down payment of 700 Billion. They can write me a check any day. Today would be nice!
Can we trust anyone? Not Wall Street!
Is the economic problem real? If yes, how deep is it? is 700B just a down payment? is there an end to tax payer bailout of Wall Street? who can be trusted with distribution 700B?
Let the free market solve the problems it created; keep taxpayer money out!
But you are forgetting all that credit card debt, all that wasteful consumerism. Did you really think that would just go on forever and you would never have to pay for it ?
Far be it from to do the same thing that got us out of the last depression.
A garden that is watered from above in the heat of the sun soon withereth away without nutrition and moisture from the soil beneath it. Grass roots philosophy. The ladder is built from the ground up, not from the top down.
Not so odd: President Bush advocates a broad plan and grab for billions of dollars after successfully expanding his war powers while preaching Democracy! Has he confused or blurred the line between fascism and democracy?
I think there are a number of pitfalls to the so-called rescue plan without clear and definite set of rules. Apparently, many economists think there is danger ahead by setting this in motion without careful thought. Surely there are some stop-gap measures that can help the liquidity issue.
If we are still a Democracy, the world needs to see a clear set of checks and balances from our leaders in Congress!
Has anyone noticed that since the bailout was not approved the market here and in Europe has posted gains?
WE don't need to be putting money in rich people's pockets. Keep hamering away with the need not to approve the bailout.
Oh and I really like the way now (on the news) "gee we didn't explain it very well, but this plan will help the little guys as well" geesh give me a break. I can't wait for election time just to throw these jokers out.
This has nothing to do with the bailout, Recapitalizing the banks is what is needed, the bailout did not do this, it just privatized the profits and Nationalized the debt. I dont see how it would have had any effect on the stock markets, as the problem remains, you need to identify which banks are solvent and which are insolvent,. Stupid American laws prevent this from happening.
The bailout was for Wall Street as well. Not just the banks.
The market is moving on and is non the worse for wear. The dire predictions was if we don't get the 700 billion Wall Street will collapse. Well, let them. The market seems healthy enough and without our money.
can these 200 economists think of a better plan for us?
plan is bunk.
the 3 pages turned into over 100 pages. if you really look at the plan, there was a lot added in that had nothing to do with the bail out but was added because politicians wanted to add frivolous stuff for their own personal reasons.
this is stupid and selfish
Your right spygirl they could come up with a much better plan, but at least 50% of the people would never accept it, because of years and years of brainwashing with platitudes about Free markets, and Capitalism is the American way.
Its funny to watch from outside the US its like a 1930;'s slap stick comedy with the politicians as the fire brigade in clown suits, rushing to the flaming Wall street, in their comic fire engine, one swing off the ladder at the back. When they arrive all they can do is argue about which fire extinguisher to use, "No No use the gold one not the red one" and "I say No use the red one not the gold one" Its a laugh a minute down there in the White House.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |